The 1954 Supreme
Court’s ruling in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka has
become one of the most significant legal decisions in this nation’s
history. In declaring that “separate but equal has no place
in the field of public education,” the Court paved the way for
the desegregation’s beginning in American life. The decision
was strengthened by the 1964 Civil Rights Act with its special emphasis
on providing equal access to places of public accommodation, while
expanding employment opportunities for African Americans.
Yet, the 1964
Civil Rights Act also marked the beginning of government support to
encourage the expansion of black business, reflected, initially, in
Federal government affirmative action mandates in contracts and procurement
policies and set-asides that required large corporations to give subcontracts
to minorities was especially important.
The purpose
of this conference, then, is to explore the impact of the federal
government on black business activity since the 1954 Brown Decision.
The Conference
Participants include three categories: scholars who have studied the
role of the federal government and black business; employees in the
various federal agencies created to promote black business; and, black
business owners who have participated in various government programs
to promote black business.
EACH YEAR, THE CENTER WILL SPONSER A CONFERENCE ON BLACK BUSINESS
OVERVIEW: THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AND BLACK BUSINESS
After the 1954
Brown decision, in the initial years of the Federal government’s
affirmative action economic programs, providing equal employment opportunities
for blacks was foremost. At that time, assistance to black business
was peripheral and indirect. The one specific agency in existence
before the Civil Rights era that could provide monetary assistance
to black businesspeople was the Small Business Administration (SBA).
While established in 1953 the SBA did not become a permanent federal
agency until 1958. Moreover, at the time of its founding and in the
early 1960s, there was no specific attempt to reach out to black businesses.
That took place
in 1964, with President Lyndon Johnson's Economic Opportunity Act
that established the Office of Economic Opportunity (OEO). Its specific
charge was to provide loans through its Economic Opportunity Loan
(EOL) Program as well as technical assistance to inner city poverty
area residents who applied to establish businesses. Unlike SBA loans
to non-minority small business, EOL loans were targeted for blacks,
but priority was given to those blacks with no business experience
and no savings who wanted to establish small, marginal, high risk
"mom-and-pop" enterprises. The EOL program went into effect
in 1965.
Within a year,
with so many loan defaults, Congress gave full control of EOL to the
SBA. Still, it would not be until the 1970s that the SBA was restructured
to provide support specifically to minorities with experience in business.
In the interim, however, by 1968, with America’s escalating
war in Vietnam, concomitant with increasing black dissidence and civil
disorders in American cities, including the catastrophic Detroit Riot
in 1967.
In the last year
of his administration, doubtless President Johnson took the position
that the demands for black economic empowerment could not just be
limited to new employment opportunities. Perhaps, too, in response
to Black Power demands that White Corporate America become actively
involved in contributing to black business development, President
Johnson established the National Alliance of Businessmen. One of the
most recognized symbols of White Corporate American at that time,
Henry Ford, II, was appointed chairman. At that time, too, several
major American corporations, including IBM, established factories
in the urban ghetto although by 1987, “of the 15 inner city
factories built by major corporations in the mid-1960s, 9 had either
been sold or closed."
Whether it was
either national or international factors, or a combination of both,
even before the end of the 1960s, strident Black Power demands for
black business expansion with the support of White Corporate America
did begin to have an impact on black business.
The federal government’s
Black Capitalism initiatives began with Nixon’s 1969 Executive
Order 11458 that established the Office of Minority Business Enterprise
(OMBE) subsequently renamed the Minority Business Development Agency
(MBDA). Also in 1971, President Nixon issued Executive Order 11625
which required that all federal agencies were directed to develop
comprehensive plans and specific program goals for a national Minority
Business Enterprise (MBE) contracting program.
From that point
on, a number of alphabet-named agencies were established to promote
minority business, with the SBA specifically strengthened to provide
federal support to encourage black business development. With the
SBA 7(a) program, the federal government provided guarantees against
defaults on bank loans made to minority businesses and the Certified
Development Company (504) Loan Program to finance fixed assets, such
as facilities or machinery.
Doubtless, the
most important provision in 1969 was the Minority Small Business/Capital
Ownership Development Program, known generally as the SBA 8(a) federal
government set-aside program. The legislation, drafted by black congressman,
Parren Mitchell, became the cornerstone of the federal government
minority business policy initiatives. The SBA 8(a) set-aside program
guarantees that a percentage of government contracts will go to minority
businesses.
Also, each federal
agency was to establish an Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business
Utilization with the mandate, found in Title IV of the 1964 Civil
Rights Act, that all government agencies seek the fullest possible
use of minority businesses in the agency's purchase of goods and services.
Then, in 1983, President Ronald Reagan issued Executive Order 12432
with its mandate that all federal agencies with substantial procurement
or grant making authority were required to develop a Minority Business
Enterprise (MBE) development plan. As a result minority-owned businesses
were positioned to secure a larger share of federal procurement contracts
and subcontracts.
Consequently,
federal government affirmative action mandates in contracts and procurement
policies and set-asides that required large corporations to give subcontracts
to minorities were especially important.. To assist these emerging
growth companies, the Small Business Administration (SBA) launched
a variety of lending programs, such as the 7(A) Loan Guaranty Program
for small businesses and the Certified Development Company (504) Loan
Program to finance fixed assets, such as facilities or machinery.
Certainly, black
businesses after 1964 benefited from federal government affirmative
action policies in force to encourage greater black business participation.
Indeed, much of the expansion of black business in certain sectors
of the economy was a result of federal government Black Capitalism
policies and initiatives put in place in the 1970s, especially the
such as the 8(a) program.
While much of
the expansion of black business in certain sectors of the economy
has been a result of federal government Black Capitalism policies
and initiatives put in place in the 1970s. By the 1990s, these policies
were losing ground, with negative results for black firms. In 1997
black firms generated only 0.4 percent of the nation’s total
($18.6 trillion) business receipts, whereas a decade earlier they
had earned 1 percent of total American business receipts.
Also, despite
substantial increases in the number of black businesses, the increase
in numbers of employees and business receipts, those gains have not
matched those of other minority owned firms in the New Economy.
Specifically,
by the 1990s these policies, challenged in state and federal courts,
were losing ground, with negative results for black firms. Specifically,
the 1989 Croson Supreme Court decision and subsequent 1995 Adarand
decision challenged African Americans businesspeople in their efforts
to successfully secure contracts from state and local governments.
Whether Congress
in the Twenty-First Century will act to strengthen various federal
government Black Capitalism initiative programs, such as the SBA 8(a)
program, one thing is clear: the federal government can no longer
ignore the reality of the abysmal place of Black business in America.
Sources: