This is written in the heart of the period we call modernism, but it anticipates almost everything about the postmodern. it is meta--that is, it is theater about theater. It is self-reflexive--much of its concerns are about the act of the author writing the text as it is being written. It refuses the notion that Meaning or Truth can be arrived at. It explores the value of low culture (the romantic melodrama) as it puts it into the service of sophisticated ideas. | ![]() |
Seven Things to Know about Luigi Pirandello
I. The Frame Narrative II. The intrusion of "characters" upon the "actors." --How do we explain the characters? They are literary creations, abandoned by their creator half-way through his composition of them. Yearning to be "born," or "completed" or "enacted" or "fulfilled," they chance upon this theatrical production (which probably does indeed present a kind of void for them to fill). --We enter as audience into the play on two or three levels. One, with the actors, trying to figure out the bizarre nature of what these characters are doing in the middle of their rehearsal. Two, entranced, as is the Producer (read: director) by the dramatic/melodramatic possibilities of the story in which the characters are enmeshed. Three, as audience to the Father and his kind of philosophical statements about life and artifice and stability of a fictional character. |
Question: Many of the Father's statements concern the relativism, perspective, an action performed in one light seen only in an other. These statements take on a philopophical hue. Are they sound arguements, or simply statements of self-justification, just meant to put himself in a better light when their drama is enacted? |