A Southern Perspective
on Public Choice and Efficiency of Environmental Policy in Heterogeneous
Society: The Impact of Population Mobility
Joshua Gogo, Department of Economics,
Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada
jgogo@connect.carleton.ca
This paper studies the
institutional requirements for efficiency and equity in environmental
policy design in southern democracies with fiscal federalism and geographical
representation. It focuses on the democracies in which the government
is actively involved in mineral exploitation as a major source of revenue;
with limited ability to generate revenue through taxes, and the negative
externality causing industry is highly localized and immobile. It employs
a public choice approach to the conflicting requirement for public
good provision and environmental efficiency in a heterogeneous society.
The literature has largely focused on advanced democracies of the north, in which
economic activities are fully privatized and government revenues are mostly,
if not all, from taxes and duties. The motivation is therefore to broaden the
scope of the discourse to include southern perspectives and complexities in the
design of environmental policy institutions.
In this model there is the possibility of multiple equilibra. There is no unanimity
in the federal legislature. In majority rule, there is incentive to centralize
environmental policy. This leads to measures that over burden the environment
in mineral exploration by minimizing abatement cost, with possibility of conflicts
with local communities resulting from displacement and disruption of local livelihood.
On the other hand, because of the linkage between mineral exploration and local
livelihood, excessive premium is placed on the environment by mineral producing
communities. Therefore, decentralization of environmental policy will lead to
measures that are also inefficient, with possibility of state failure.
By introducing population mobility and environmentalist non-governmental organizations,
the model predicts that while there is the possibility of reduction in externality
(improving efficiency), there is also the possibility of minority control of
political power, which also leads to conflict.
Specialized institutions are required in these circumstances to efficiently mediate
environmental policies outside the state and markets.
|