Repatriation to Where?
Repatriating Refugees Flowing from A Failed State in Sub-Saharan Africa:
Somali Refugees in Kenya, 1992-2004
Ahmednasir M. Abdullahi, Ahmednasir,
Abdikadir & Co. Advocates, Nairobi, Kenya
ahmednasir@ahmedabdi.com
Between 1992 and 2004 the government of Kenya
with the assistance and support of the United Nations High Commission for Refugees
initiated and implemented a scheme to repatriate Somali refugees in Kenya.
Over 250,000 refugees were returned to Somalia. During the period under review
Somalia following the collapse of the Said Barre regime and the calamitous
consequences that followed was without an effective government and thus couldn’t
enter into any international relationship on the international plane.
The repatriation of Somali refugees in Kenya during the period under study
raises a number of interesting and intertwined legal issues that has rarely
been interrogated.
First, it raises in a most unique manner the applicability of the legal concept
of repatriation under international law which dictates that it must be voluntary
and can only be undertaken when the conditions that initially caused the refugees
to flee their country no longer exists. A subset of such a matrix is the question
how voluntary the exercise of repatriation was In light of the Somali civil
war.
Second, the repatriation exercise raises a fundamental issue that was ignored:
can a failed state without an effective government receive back its citizens?
Under international law, there must exist two states the repatriating state
and the receiving state. All conventions both international and regional recognize
the existence of two states to coordinate the exercise. The absence of Somalia
as the receiving state clearly invalidates such an exercise.
The paper covers issues of failed state, the concept of repatriation and reaches
the conclusion that the repatriation of Somali refugees in Kenya fails to meet
the very minimum criteria of voluntary repatriation in international law.
|